W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: #312: should there be a permanent variant of 307?

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:40:41 +0100
Message-ID: <4EBD5009.9050502@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

On 2011-11-11 17:22, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> WFM
> ...

-> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/1474>

Best regards, Julian

Received on Friday, 11 November 2011 16:41:13 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Julian Reschke: "Re: #312: should there be a permanent variant of 307?"
Previous message: Julian Reschke: "Re: #324: URI includes query"
In reply to: Mark Nottingham: "Re: #312: should there be a permanent variant of 307?"
Next in thread: Julian Reschke: "Re: #312: should there be a permanent variant of 307?"
Reply: Julian Reschke: "Re: #312: should there be a permanent variant of 307?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:26 UTC