- From: Thomson, Martin <Martin.Thomson@commscope.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 10:10:23 +0800
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2011-10-07 at 11:01:50, Thomson, Martin wrote: > On 2011-10-07 at 10:52:45, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > No, the "X-" was intentionally put there to match similar > > extensibility in for instance HTTP-headers. > > Why waste the bytes? Anything other than "http" or "https" can be > recognized as an "extension" without some arbitrary 2 octet prefix. > > Or were you looking for a rerun of the "X-" spat? I was just informed that you might not have read this: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saintandre-xdash It might explain my reaction, for which I apologize.
Received on Friday, 7 October 2011 02:11:00 UTC