- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:15:18 +1000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 31/08/2011, at 4:12 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > "The action required MAY be carried out by the user agent without interaction with the user if and only if the method used in the second request is known to be "safe", as defined in Section 6.1.1." ... Right. The problem is that when you combine that requirement with the proposed text, it doesn't make a lot of sense, because there is no "second request' for a 304 response... -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2011 06:15:45 UTC