- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:39:00 +0200
- To: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2011-08-26 22:16, Karl Dubost wrote: > > Le 29 juin 2011 à 06:17, Mark Nottingham a écrit : >> 3.1 Considerations for Creating Header Fields > […] > > Not sure if it's true, but in case it is. After this > >> Under no conditions can the "Close" field-name be registered, because it is reserved for use as a connection token. > > > Should there be a mention discouraging the rewriting of headers to change the behavior of an existing header. > > "Under no conditions a new header should > redefine requirements of an existing > header." > ... It appears to me that there are lots of things we *could* say; but may not have to. What do others think?
Received on Sunday, 28 August 2011 14:39:29 UTC