- From: Thomson, Martin <Martin.Thomson@commscope.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 07:49:05 +0800
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Alexandre Morgaut <Alexandre.Morgaut@4d.com>
- CC: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>, httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2011-08-26 at 07:24:22, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > The server can do whatever it wants to do, including telling the > client okay to the DELETE and then creating a new representation for > that resource a minute later. Whether or not that makes sense depends > entirely on the meaning of that resource -- not HTTP. I've always found 410 to be a bit weird. The idea that *any* information about a particular resource can be considered permanent is antithetical to my understanding of the way the system works. --Martin
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 23:49:49 UTC