- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:44:55 +0200
- To: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
- CC: Alexandre Morgaut <Alexandre.Morgaut@4d.com>, J Ross Nicoll <jrn@jrn.me.uk>, httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2011-08-25 16:35, Karl Dubost wrote: > Alexandre, Julian, > > Le 25 août 2011 à 09:10, Alexandre Morgaut a écrit : >> This difference is an interesting piece of information to give to the user but for some privacy policy it might also be a lack of security. > > Ah! interesting. Tell us more. > > Le 25 août 2011 à 08:48, Julian Reschke a écrit : >> Why? >> Why not 404? >> And 200 is possible once the URI gets mapped again... > > Why 410 Gone? > because I had the feeling it was a good practice aka for intermediaries and search engines to say forget about this URI. There was something here indeed it is not a mistake but it is just gone for good. > ... How would the server know that the DELETE wasn't a "mistake"? I don't believe it can know that. Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 14:45:44 UTC