Re: Ambiguities in header-field rules (p1-messaging)

On 2011-08-18 10:09, Frank Mertens wrote:
> ...
> Yes, we should also have a strict version of the grammar.
> But for now, I'm happy with a working tolerant one;)
> Replacing OWS by BWS would also disable support for line folding.
> ...

We have discussed this years ago and as far as I recall decided to keep 
things simple by having a single ABNF, and add additional producer 
constraints into prose.

At this stage, I'm very reluctant to change this.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Sunday, 21 August 2011 15:11:10 UTC