- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:40:06 +1000
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
The 202 Accepted status code has come up from time to time, with people liking the idea behind it, but needing a bit more. <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-15#section-8.2.3> I'm wondering if we can clarify things a little bit by adding two bits of text: --8<--- A 202 response MAY carry a Retry-After header field that indicates an estimation of when the processing might be complete. It MAY also carry a Location header that indicates the URI of a resource that will be created once processing has completed. --->8--- Thoughts? -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2011 04:40:34 UTC