- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:14:17 -0700
- To: Matthew Cox <macox@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Jun 3, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Matthew Cox wrote: > Part 5 section 5.3 If-Range has the following text in the case that the response has no etag and only Last-Modified. > If a client wishes to perform a sub-range retrieval on a value for > which it has only a Last-Modified time and no opaque validator, it > MAY do this only if the Last-Modified time is strong in the sense > described in Section 2.1.2 of [Part4]. > > Section 2.1.2 in Part 4 has this text: > o The validator is about to be used by a client in an If-Modified- > Since or If-Unmodified-Since header field, because the client has > a cache entry for the associated representation, and > > o That cache entry includes a Date value, which gives the time when > the origin server sent the original response, and > > o The presented Last-Modified time is at least 60 seconds before the > Date value. > > This seems to exclude If-Range which is strange since the If-Range text pointed to this section. Is it possible to add If-Range to the text in the first bullet point, or make the text more generic such that it doesn’t exclude other methods that use the Last-Modified time? I was in the process of rewriting part 4 the last time I swapped out. My intention was to remove the reference to If-Range and simply copy the last two bullets (one sentence) to Part 5. ....Roy
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2011 00:14:51 UTC