- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 19:57:19 -0700
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Jul 17, 2011, at 2:48 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Roy, this is not how I read RFC2616 : Please read the section on Upgrade. > The term "immediately after the empty line which terminates the 101 response" > is pretty clear to me : HTTP ends after the 101 response, and immediately > after it, it is the next protocol. So there clearly is not any other HTTP > response after 101. It may not be how you designed it 12 years ago, but it > is how it's documented and how people have been using it. WebSocket is even > relying on this in the handshake. If WebSocket relies on broken behavior, in spite of the many times that I have posted the correct handshake, then someone should fix WebSockets. ....Roy
Received on Monday, 18 July 2011 02:57:48 UTC