- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:49:58 +0200
- To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
* Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >There is absolutely no support in the text for the notion that >the server should send a 200 reponse between the 101 and the >switch of protocol. My impression is that the issue is whether you can have a HTTP request that goes unanswered and then have meaningful exchanges on the same connection. Is HTTP a "request-response" protocol, or a "request and then either response or protocol switch" protocol? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Sunday, 17 July 2011 22:50:02 UTC