- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 00:52:28 +0200
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: Joe Orton <joe@manyfish.co.uk>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:50:35PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20110705164148.GA5119@manyfish.co.uk>, Joe Orton writes: > >On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 07:14:01AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > >> It's not exact because of 101 which should contain at least Upgrade and > >> Connection: Upgrade. In fact, 101 is a final status while 100 is an > >> intermediate one. > > > >That is not true, the client must wait for the final response on the > >upgraded connection. > > As far as HTTP is concerned it is final, we have no idea what the > upgraded protocol is or what semantics it might have. Agreed, and I'd also add that seeing nothing else might very well be a valid final response for the upgraded protocol. Willy
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 22:54:23 UTC