Re: 1xx response semantics

In message <20110705065339.GF12909@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes:
>On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 06:13:03AM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

>After all, saying that 101 is an exception to 1xx
>is not much different from saying that 204 is an exception to 2xx in
>that it does not hold any body.

Explaining that it is in the wrong group would make the overall scheme
clearer and hopefully deter similar additions in the future.


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 07:17:45 UTC