- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:02:02 +1100
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
I've incorporated as <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/1110>. On 05/02/2011, at 10:33 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > > On 05/02/2011, at 4:42 AM, Alex Rousskov wrote: > [...] > >> I would still replace the last "it" as it is not 100% clear what it >> refers to: >> >> """ >> Note that if a request containing this directive is satisfied from a >> cache, the no-store request directive does not apply to the already >> stored response. >> """ >> >> Which actually reads a little backwards because if the request is >> satisfied from a cache, the proxy obviously thinks the no-store does not >> apply! Consider this simplification: >> >> """ >> The server MAY ignore the no-store request directive when satisfying a >> request from a cache. >> """ > > > Not exactly; the directive also prohibits aspects of the request message from being stored. > > I agree it's a bit stilted, but I think it's correct: > >> """ >> Note that if a request containing this directive is satisfied from a >> cache, the no-store request directive does not apply to the already >> stored response. >> """ > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2011 02:02:35 UTC