- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 10:33:54 +1100
- To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 05/02/2011, at 4:42 AM, Alex Rousskov wrote: [...] > I would still replace the last "it" as it is not 100% clear what it > refers to: > > """ > Note that if a request containing this directive is satisfied from a > cache, the no-store request directive does not apply to the already > stored response. > """ > > Which actually reads a little backwards because if the request is > satisfied from a cache, the proxy obviously thinks the no-store does not > apply! Consider this simplification: > > """ > The server MAY ignore the no-store request directive when satisfying a > request from a cache. > """ Not exactly; the directive also prohibits aspects of the request message from being stored. I agree it's a bit stilted, but I think it's correct: > """ > Note that if a request containing this directive is satisfied from a > cache, the no-store request directive does not apply to the already > stored response. > """ -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 4 February 2011 23:34:26 UTC