- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 18:08:49 +1000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
Agreed on both counts. Now #296: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/296 On 31/05/2011, at 5:16 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2011-05-31 06:42, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> Revised proposal: >> >> """ >> 8.2.4. 203 Non-Authoritative Information >> >> The representation in the response has been transformed or otherwise modified by a non-transparent proxy [ref to p1]. Note that the behaviour of non-transparent intermediaries is controlled by the no-transform Cache-Control dirctive [ref to p6]. > > Part 1 uses the terms transforming-/non-transforming proxy (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-14.html#intermediaries>). > > Maybe also say "transforming intermediaries" instead no "transparent intermediaries"? > >> This status code is only appropriate when the response status code would have been 200 (OK). When the status code before transformation would have been >> different, the 214 Transformation Applied warn-code [ref] is appropriate. >> >> Caches MAY use a heuristic (see Section 2.3.1.1 of [Part6]) to determine freshness for 203 responses. >> """ > > I feel this is actually a *change* compared to 2616 (the spec, not the actual practice); thus we may have to list it in the Changes appendix. > > Best regards, Julian -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 08:09:16 UTC