W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: Discussion of Blob URI Scheme for Binary Data Access | IETF

From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 12:43:46 -0700
Message-ID: <4DCD89F2.2060800@gmail.com>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
More honest implementation of decentralized XMPP would be the good 
start. I mean honest as in avoid 0-point-botnets and more physicality to 

Some implement streams where you have to subscribe to each one, with 
hidden expectation to offload compute "payload". Some others implement 
servers that subscribe to those streams to compute that payload and 
combine those streams into customizable stream aggregates. When they try 
to offload the "payload" again from the aggregates, they get overly 
aggressive "botnets".

People have tried to avoid the botnets and go more direct to the API of 
those servers and discoverable resources. That's where we have mapped 
you... X

X only wants to allow Y and Z transversal with optional map of U and V. 
In fact, YUV is already standard.

On 05/13/2011 12:01 PM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
> Problems along the way was an elaborate discussion of why we 
> specifically didn't reuse an existing scheme.

--- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant
Received on Friday, 13 May 2011 19:45:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:13:52 UTC