- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 21:42:36 +0100
- To: "Jungshik Shin (신정식, 申政湜)" <jungshik@google.com>
- CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi Jungshik, On 15.12.2010 21:19, Jungshik Shin (신정식, 申政湜) wrote: > ... > Before rushing to remove it (as an optional 'fallback') , I'd like to > have some 'numbers' about what web servers do (FYI, some Google products > emit RFC 2047 for Firefox and Chrome at the moment, but I guess Google > has to switch over to RFC 5987 for Firefox and Chrome). I'm not sure > whether the cost of supporting it is larger than the benefit. > ... Well, there's an ongoing cost of having many ways to do the same thing, each of which not being interoperable. I believe that of those the RFC 2047 is the worst. But you are right of course -- data would be great. Any idea on how long it would take to get this data? Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 15 December 2010 20:43:16 UTC