- From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 19:30:19 +0000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Hi Julian, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 09.12.2010 04:18, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > >> ... >> (I gather from the draft draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth is supposed to >> establish the registry; it seems a bit odd to me that there is a >> separate draft only to put Basic and Digest into that registry; it >> might be a good idea to offer some rationale for that in the draft, >> i.e. why draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth doesn't register them.) > > > ... > > Essentially for the same reason we do it in for methods. > > Also, I really want to avoid giving the impression that Part 7 does > recommend or even specify Digest; my understanding is that this will > cause massive problems once we'd get to the IESG. That is probably wise. Should the document register other schemes like Negotiate? > Is there a polite way to say that in the Introduction? Do we really > need to? > > Best regards, Julian > -- IETF Application Area Director, <http://www.ietf.org/iesg/members.html> Internet Messaging Team Lead, <http://www.isode.com> JID: same as my email address
Received on Friday, 10 December 2010 19:30:58 UTC