- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:35:10 +0100
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 09.12.2010 04:18, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > ... > (I gather from the draft draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth is supposed to > establish the registry; it seems a bit odd to me that there is a > separate draft only to put Basic and Digest into that registry; it > might be a good idea to offer some rationale for that in the draft, > i.e. why draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth doesn't register them.) > ... Essentially for the same reason we do it in for methods. Also, I really want to avoid giving the impression that Part 7 does recommend or even specify Digest; my understanding is that this will cause massive problems once we'd get to the IESG. Is there a polite way to say that in the Introduction? Do we really need to? Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2010 08:35:49 UTC