- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 17:10:54 -0500
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 16:56 +0100, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 06.11.2010 20:15, David Booth wrote: > > Comments on Section 6.1: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-12#section-6.1 > > > > 1. The first sentence says: "It is sometimes necessary to determine an > > identifier for the resource associated with a representation". But > > rules 1-3 only say what *resource* is associated with the > > representation, rather than saying what the *identifier* is. > > Actually, all points talk primarily about resources, some of which may > not have a URI (last rule). > > We could change the first sentence to > > "It is sometimes necessary to determine the resource associated with a > representation." > > Would that help? Actually, my point was intended the other way around: it would be helpful if rules 1-3 said what URI the resource associated with the representation has. thanks -- David Booth, Ph.D. Cleveland Clinic (contractor) http://dbooth.org/ Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Cleveland Clinic.
Received on Monday, 8 November 2010 22:11:22 UTC