- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:17:42 +0200
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 25.10.2010 14:00, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis Working Group of the IETF. > > > Title : Use of the Content-Disposition Header Field in the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) > Author(s) : J. Reschke > Filename : draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-03.txt > Pages : 14 > Date : 2010-10-25 > > HTTP/1.1 defines the Content-Disposition response header field, but > points out that it is not part of the HTTP/1.1 Standard. This > specification takes over the definition and registration of Content- > Disposition, as used in HTTP, and clarifies internationalization > aspects. > ... Hi all, the WGLC for draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp ended last weekend, and I just submitted the draft mentioned above, addressing (hopefully) all WGLC comments. The changes compared to the previous version are summarized in <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-03.html#changes.since.02>: > Closed issues: > > * <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/244>: "state that repeating parameters are invalid" > * <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/245>: "warn about %xx in filenames being misinterpreted" > * <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/246>: "mention control chars when talking about postprecessing the filename parameter" > > Update Appendix C.4; Opera 10.63 RC implements the recommended fallback behavior. Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 25 October 2010 12:18:25 UTC