Re: Questions (errata?) about caching authenticated responses [#174]

tis 2010-06-08 klockan 11:33 +1000 skrev Mark Nottingham:
> I haven't heard any comment on this proposal. I *think* it accurately reflects what's in 2616, and AFAICT from the history, what's in 2616 was intentional. 
> Thoughts?

Looks fine to me.


Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 06:29:36 UTC