- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:06:49 +1000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
On 02/06/2010, at 6:45 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Looks good to me. That being said, I rearranged the sentences and ended up with: [snip] Fine by me. > Ticket 168 furthermore mentions: > >> Furthermore, the BNF doesn't make it clear that request and response directives shouldn't be intermixed; >> >> Cache-Control-v = 1#cache-directive >> >> cache-directive = cache-request-directive >> >> / cache-response-directive > > That could be addressed by saying: > > Cache-Control-v = 1#cache-request-directive > / 1#cache-response-directive > > However, I'm not sure we need to express this as a syntactical constraint (and it also might confuse people with respect to whether this header uses the "list style" or not). Yes; I'm not sure we can really do anything about this, except make sure it's clear in the prose. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 3 June 2010 07:06:23 UTC