- From: Wenbo Zhu <wenboz@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 12:34:48 -0700
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <AANLkTikTPlQElA83C5Ro6ii1WhgmFcKUi0-U9PXSw8XF@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for everyone who has replied to this thread. Given that valid use cases do exist and the current HTTP spec hasn't explicitly disallowed concurrent bi-directional communication, I have submit a draft document as "Implications of Full-Duplex HTTP ( http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zhu-http-fullduplex-01.txt)". The purpose of this draft is to encourage public adoption of full-duplex HTTP and as well to help incorporating full-duplex HTTP into other open protocols. Comments/corrections are very much welcome! - Wenbo <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zhu-http-fullduplex-01.txt> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>wrote: > On 17.05.2010 02:30, Wenbo Zhu wrote: > >> ... >> >> A more general question is how well proxies support chunk-encoded >> requests today, since browsers don't generate chunk-encoded requests. >> Would like to hear your experiences on this >> ... >> > > My company used to work on a WebDAV client component in SAP Netweaver's > Knowledge Management (for connecting remote WebDAV servers). We certainly > used chunked encoding in requests (serializing WebDAV XML). We occasionally > had issues with that, but as far as I recall that was because of broken > origin servers (subsequently being fixed), not proxies. > > > Best regards, Julian >
Received on Friday, 28 May 2010 19:35:18 UTC