- From: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 20:00:41 +0200
- To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
mån 2010-05-24 klockan 13:13 +1200 skrev Adrien de Croy: > Tests with unmodified Firefox and IE showed no problem with multiple 102 > responses prior to the final response as well (even though this won't be > an issue since the draft proposes the client explicitly advertises support). Hmm.. is that explicit negotiation really needed? Checking.. right the specs says "Unexpected 1xx status responses MAY be ignored by a user agent", not MUST, so sending progress updates MAY break HTTP/1.1 compliant clients. The question however is if that perhaps should be a MUST? Regards Henrik
Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2010 18:01:16 UTC