Re: http progress notification

Adrien de Croy wrote:
> On 26/05/2010 4:12 a.m., Julian Reschke wrote:
>> You really really should choose a free status code; 102 has been 
>> defined in RFC 2518.
> [...] it was discussed that the existing webdav 102 status could be an 
> appropriate code - in other words that the Progress response header 
> could be an application for it.

'102 Processing' seems like a very good fit to me (but not 102 OK / 
Progress / Info), provided that you extend the existing definition in a 
compatible way.




Thanks and Regards,
Elias

Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2010 22:38:21 UTC