Re: Query string cacheability

On 20.05.2010 00:09, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> I would prefer to remove the paragraph from the spec.  It was not true when
> it was added, it isn't true now, and it won't be true tomorrow.
> ....Roy

How about removing that, but including a statement that for historic 
reasons, some caches will default to non-cacheable, thus it might be 
needed to explicitly specify an expiration time?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 20 May 2010 14:10:15 UTC