Re: Issue 196, was: #110: how to determine what entity a response carries from Julian Reschke on 2010-05-18 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2010)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 22:07:13 +0200
To: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4BF2F371.80003@gmx.de>

On 18.05.2010 22:03, Henrik Nordström wrote:
> tis 2010-05-18 klockan 22:00 +0200 skrev Julian Reschke:
>> On 18.05.2010 21:58, Henrik Nordström wrote:
>>> tis 2010-05-18 klockan 21:38 +0200 skrev Julian Reschke:
>>>
>>>> +1; having the mapping depend on the method name is really strange. Q:
>>>> what does Squid do in this case?
>>>
>>> Squid currently follows 2616 on this.
>>
>> And it hardwires "OPTIONS", right?
>
> No. The "*" mapping do not exists in 2616. Was resurrected from 2068.

Oh, I see.

So have you ever seen complaints about "*" not working through Squid?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 18 May 2010 20:35:12 UTC