Re: Issue 200 ("word" in ABNF), was: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 from Julian Reschke on 2010-04-16 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2010)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:52:31 +0200
To: IETF HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
CC: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
Message-ID: <4BC84F7F.3070201@gmx.de>

On 12.04.2010 15:48, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Picking up an older thread...:
>
> We now have "word" explained in the prose (as of draft 09).
>
> What's still left to discuss is whether we want to change the ABNF,
> defining
>
> word = token / quoted-string
>
> and use "word" throughout where we currently have "token / quoted-string".
>
> Proposed change in:
>
>
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/200/i200.diff>
>
>
> Last-calling... I intend to make this change (affecting Parts 1 and 3)
> later this week.
> ...

Applied with <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/810>; 
this should close issue 200.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Friday, 16 April 2010 11:53:14 UTC