- From: Wenbo Zhu <wenboz@google.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 15:05:42 -0700
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
I have recently noticed that many public websites, in responding to a HEAD request, will: - omit Transfer-Encoding from the response headers if the GET response will be chunk-encoded; -- or (as expected) set the Content-Length if the GET response isn't going to be chunk-encoded; - or set Content-Length = 0; - or set a manual Content-Length as if there would be no chunk-encoding for the GET response. While rfc-2616 doesn't require all the headers appear in the HEAD response, the confusion here mostly lies in whether Transfer-Encoding is applicable for a HEAD response (as it is the case for Content-Length). To clarify, 7.4 (9.4/rfc2616) may state: "The metainformation contained in the HTTP headers in response to a HEAD request SHOULD be identical to the information sent in response to a GET request; and any headers that describe message body should be applied to the response of the GET request". - Wenbo
Received on Sunday, 11 April 2010 22:06:12 UTC