Re: Issue 39: proposed example for varying the etag based on conneg

Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 26.03.2010 00:39, Nathan wrote:
> >only feedback I can give is my immediate question:
> >
> >   can they share a weak entity tag?
> >
> >many regards,
> >
> >nathan
> >...
> I don't see how... Would you consider the gzipped version of a 
> text/plain resource to be "semantically equivalent"?

Yes, without a doubt they are semantically equivalent.  The compressed
and uncompressed versions say exactly the same thing in different
ways.  Their relationship is even purely mechanical and reversible.
Isn't that about as semantically equivalent as you can get?

-- Jamie

Received on Thursday, 1 April 2010 22:15:25 UTC