- From: Kris Zyp <kris@sitepen.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:34:51 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Julian Reschke wrote: > Kris Zyp wrote: >> Julian Reschke wrote: >>> [snip] >>>> We'll also need to determine what the requirements for >>>> registration are (standards-track?), and set up the registry. >>>> >>> For now we haven't defined a registry (I think the idea was to >>> wait for the first use case to come up and then discuss again). >>> >> So if I wanted to submit a request to register "items" as a range >> unit extension per the discussion in this thread ([1] for >> reference), is there a way I could that? >> >> [1] http://markmail.org/message/re6oo4hq3wvt6qhn ... > > The short answer I think is: not right now. > > But even if HTTPbis *did* have the registry now, using it would > block publication until HTTPbis is ready as well. Would that be > acceptable? Thats fine, I am in no hurry. We'll just plan on registering it at some point in the future when everything is ready. Thanks, - -- Kris Zyp SitePen (503) 806-1841 http://sitepen.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAksNXKsACgkQ9VpNnHc4zAwc4ACePFP+HeIH3Qxs9JLI2ZIthchg 7SUAn2TYkdur4tQd6IW03g9FLNKxwwYk =sZUb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 25 November 2009 16:35:37 UTC