- From: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:24:48 +1300
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Kris Zyp <kris@sitepen.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
I thought when this was discussed previously it was concluded that range unit extensions were a really bad idea, and that they were to be deprecated. or was that just wishful thinking on my part? How on earth is a proxy supposed to deal with extensions to range units? Julian Reschke wrote: > Kris Zyp wrote: >> Julian Reschke wrote: >>> [snip] >>>> We'll also need to determine what the requirements for registration >>>> are (standards-track?), and set up the registry. >>> For now we haven't defined a registry (I think the idea was to wait >>> for the first use case to come up and then discuss again). >> So if I wanted to submit a request to register "items" as a range unit >> extension per the discussion in this thread ([1] for reference), is >> there a way I could that? >> >> [1] http://markmail.org/message/re6oo4hq3wvt6qhn >> ... > > The short answer I think is: not right now. > > But even if HTTPbis *did* have the registry now, using it would block > publication until HTTPbis is ready as well. Would that be acceptable? > > BR, Julian > > -- Adrien de Croy - WinGate Proxy Server - http://www.wingate.com
Received on Wednesday, 25 November 2009 21:21:26 UTC