- From: Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:20:31 -0500
- To: Bill de hOra <bill@dehora.net>
- Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, Atom-Syntax Syntax <atom-syntax@imc.org>, Hadrien Gardeur <hadrien.gardeur@feedbooks.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Joe Gregorio <joe@bitworking.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org, Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net>
> IOW allow the link registry to define rel scopes. The url or clash thing
> sucks and I don't want someone rolling up with a curies/qnames or some
> other XML macrocrap proposal for Atom.
Yeah, it would be a huge mistake to use something that's pretty much
already guaranteed to be part of your Atom infrastructure. Far better to
create yet another distributed naming scheme.
Not.
r$
--
STSM, WebSphere Appliance Architect
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/soma/
Received on Thursday, 12 November 2009 23:21:10 UTC