- From: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>
- Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 23:58:43 -0500
- To: "'Mark Nottingham'" <mnot@mnot.net>, "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "'Robert Brewer'" <fumanchu@aminus.org>, "'HTTP Working Group'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Mark Nottingham wrote: > I don't think a new issue is necessary; IMO it's a stretch to say that > the 2616 text requires servers to have separate URIs for different > variants, and certainly that wasn't in 2068 (see issue text). I don't get what you mean. Are you saying it is OK to use the same Content-Location for multiple variants of the same resource? If so, then what is the point of Content-Location? And, in particular, what is the point of saying that servers SHOULD return Content-Location when there are multiple variants, if the Content-Location of those variants could all be the same as the Request-URI? - Brian
Received on Tuesday, 6 October 2009 04:59:12 UTC