- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:23:15 -0700
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Sep 15, 2009, at 10:43 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Yeah, what Julian said; I'd like to do this, but am concerned about > what it would mean. It would mean that sending other quoted characters would no longer comply with the protocol. Since I don't know of any implementations that quote other characters, that's fine with me. It also means that recipients of other quoted characters should consider the backslash to be used in error, which is probably a good thing since the only reason to backslash other characters on purpose is to trigger a security hole. > Can we keep it (relatively) open in BNF, and caution against > quoting anything but DQUOTE in prose? > > Not a great solution, but... We could, but how does that help implementations? I'd rather be more conservative in the ABNF and let Postel's Law influence the prose. I suspect that other uses of backslash are not intended to be quoting in any case, so the recipient is probably better off treating them as two characters. e.g., DOS pathnames. ....Roy
Received on Wednesday, 16 September 2009 06:23:57 UTC