- From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:40:15 -0600
- To: Kris Zyp <kris@sitepen.com>
- CC: Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net>, Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@mac.com>, jpanzer@acm.org, Lisa Dusseault <lisa.dusseault@gmail.com>, Atom-Syntax Syntax <atom-syntax@imc.org>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/11/09 10:30 AM, Kris Zyp wrote: > > > Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> On 9/11/09 7:04 AM, Kris Zyp wrote: > >>> We (Dojo toolkit) have been using REST Channels [1] for clients >>> to receive real-time notifications of resource updates. >>> Could/should we use the "hub" relation for resources to reference >>> the URI that Dojo/clients connect to for updates? And if so it >>> seems like "updates" or "notifications" would be a more generic, >>> fitting term than "hub" (but "hub" isn't bad). >> I like "updates" or "notifications" -- "hub" seems specific to >> pubsubhubbub, whereas the pointer might be to a SIP notifications >> service, an XMPP PubSub service, or who knows what. > Actually, didn't SIP already define a relation name of "monitor" (and > "monitor-group" for notification of resource changes [1]? Why wouldn't > we follow that precedent (pubsubhubbub could use "monitor" that > couldn't they?). Or does monitor/monitor-group imply something different? > [1] > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-roach-sip-http-subscribe-02#section-5.1 Good point, I had forgotten about that. We might as well re-use that. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkqqfW8ACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxX/ACfc+xUQFcjgDwL+7LrR5yKyBEy jrkAni0zCVK4LrDp/yc+NogQuGf26Sdm =ykL5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 11 September 2009 16:40:58 UTC