- From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:19:20 -0600
- To: Kris Zyp <kris@sitepen.com>
- CC: Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net>, Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@mac.com>, jpanzer@acm.org, Lisa Dusseault <lisa.dusseault@gmail.com>, Atom-Syntax Syntax <atom-syntax@imc.org>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/11/09 7:04 AM, Kris Zyp wrote: > We (Dojo toolkit) have been using REST Channels [1] for clients to > receive real-time notifications of resource updates. Could/should we > use the "hub" relation for resources to reference the URI that > Dojo/clients connect to for updates? And if so it seems like "updates" > or "notifications" would be a more generic, fitting term than "hub" > (but "hub" isn't bad). I like "updates" or "notifications" -- "hub" seems specific to pubsubhubbub, whereas the pointer might be to a SIP notifications service, an XMPP PubSub service, or who knows what. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkqqeIgACgkQNL8k5A2w/vyPYQCgn7vT0g0gHgn+/BgNBl0iG3M0 3D8AmwbIOuyYDgUGO7JyfgLm3FD4zbfh =ECAn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 11 September 2009 16:20:03 UTC