- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:41:15 +1000
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 24/07/2009, at 11:55 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > I think this section should not talk about what implementations are > allowed to do internally. The concern of the specification should be > what goes in and what goes out. Therefore I think the entire last > paragraph should be dropped. We should not give the impression that http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/stylesheet > will _ever_ work. I was sorely tempted to do this a little while ago. Unless someone objects strongly, I'm going to drop that text (currently a separate para). > Also, can we require that the canonical registration form is > lowercase? That's probably sensible. I'll modify the BNF and prose. Additionally, any objections to requiring sgml-name (probably needs a new name, now that it's going to be all lower) for registered? Currently it's SHOULD. Thanks, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 21 August 2009 06:41:55 UTC