- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:06:42 +1000
- To: Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
They should, but because these were registered previously, they aren't. On 20/08/2009, at 5:06 PM, Sam Johnston wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> > wrote: > I'm thinking that the following registered relations are in fact > specific to one format or application, and this should be noted in > their registrations. > > current > edit > edit-media > enclosure > next-archive > prev-archive > replies > service > > Comments? > > I would have thought that the relations should be generic and the > types specific. > > Sam > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 21 August 2009 05:07:20 UTC