Re: Link: grandfathered format-specific registered relations

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> I'm thinking that the following registered relations are in fact specific
> to one format or application, and this should be noted in their
> registrations.
>
> current
> edit
> edit-media
> enclosure
> next-archive
> prev-archive
> replies
> service
>
> Comments?
>

I would have thought that the relations should be generic and the types
specific.

Sam