- From: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
- cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0908101235380.5225@egate.xpasc.com>
Agree ... surely time to remove HTTP/0.9 from the specification. If we could get away with it, I'd require 0.9 requests be rejected as not supported. A historical note and reference to an older RFC might be appropriate as it might help a newbie understand some part of server code they have inherited, etc. Dave Morris On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Mark Nottingham wrote: > <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/184> >> p1 appendix B: >> >> It is worth noting that, at the time of composing this specification >> (1996), we would expect commercial HTTP/1.1 servers to: >> >> • recognize the format of the Request-Line for HTTP/0.9, 1.0, and 1.1 >> requests; >> • understand any valid request in the format of HTTP/0.9, 1.0, or >> 1.1; >> • respond appropriately with a message in the same major version used >> by the client. > > This was discussed in Stockholm, and the feeling in the room was that we > should remove HTTP/0.9 from this text. Although it wasn't specifically > discussed, we'll also change the date. > > Any further comments? > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >
Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 19:39:43 UTC