Re: Update on issue 155 (Content Sniffing)

On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:15:39 +0200, Mark Nottingham <> wrote:
> I think the general feeling here is that by calling out sniffing as a  
> possibility, it will encourage it. As it stands, sniffing is not  
> prohibited, it just isn't advertised as something that should be done.  
> I.e., the content sniffing spec will NOT be in conflict with HTTP. Does  
> that work for you?

Yeah, your message is probably sufficient in case there is/was/will be any doubt. Thanks!

Anne van Kesteren

Received on Wednesday, 5 August 2009 18:59:57 UTC