Re: Issue 43 (combining fragments)

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> tis 2009-07-28 klockan 17:32 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordstrom:
>> And we don't allow fragments in Location or Content-Location either,
>> with both referencing absoluteURI and not URI-reference. Neither 2068,
>> 2396 or 3986 (in the form of absolute-URI) allows fragments in this
>> production.
> My error. Forgot that we had changed Location to reference URI instead
> of absolute-URI.
> So my question in light of what has been seen, should that change stay
> or should we revert back to absolute-URI as used by 2068 and 2616 moving
> the use of fragments back into the "undefined" field?

They are used in practice, and their behavior *is* defined in case the 
original URI didn't have a fragment.

BR, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 15:43:06 UTC