- From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:36:16 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
tis 2009-07-28 klockan 17:32 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordstrom: > And we don't allow fragments in Location or Content-Location either, > with both referencing absoluteURI and not URI-reference. Neither 2068, > 2396 or 3986 (in the form of absolute-URI) allows fragments in this > production. My error. Forgot that we had changed Location to reference URI instead of absolute-URI. So my question in light of what has been seen, should that change stay or should we revert back to absolute-URI as used by 2068 and 2616 moving the use of fragments back into the "undefined" field? Regards Henrik
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 15:36:49 UTC