- From: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I don't discern an 'official' location for discussion of this proposal. There is a serious termnology conflict with the term 'chunk' meaning a slice of the original file AND a unit of transfer encoding. Perhaps some underlying confusion re. transfer encoding in general. Dave Morris On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > This draft made a bit of surprise appearance in the transport area > meeting today: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ford-http-multi-server > > My initial reaction is lots of obvious overlap with other work and > misunderstandings of basic HTTP functions like ETag. > > Basic motivation behind the work may be reasonable however. > > I will try to catch the author for a more in-depth discussion shortly. > > Other opinions? > > Regards > Henrik >
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 00:21:27 UTC