- From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 02:23:57 +0200
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
The requirements regarding combining partial responses have changed and is stricter than 2616. 2616 only required a strong cache validator which MAY mean Last-Modified in certain conditions (p4 4) not that there necessarily is an ETag. Is this change really intended? Please note that If-Range do allow for Last-Modified based validators. Additionally p5 5.3 does allow for Last-Modified to be used in If-Range, but does not really allow the server to respond with 206 in such case... 2616 13.5.4: - Both the incoming response and the cache entry have a cache validator. - The two cache validators match using the strong comparison function (see section 13.3.3). p6 2.7: If the status code is 206 (partial content), both the stored and new responses MUST have ETags, and those ETags MUST match using the strong comparison function (see Section 4 of [Part4]). Otherwise, the responses MUST NOT be combined. p5 5.3: If the client has no entity tag for an entity, but does have a Last-Modified date, it MAY use that date in an If-Range header. [...] If the entity tag given in the If-Range header matches the current entity tag for the entity, then the server SHOULD provide the specified sub-range of the entity using a 206 (Partial Content) response. If the entity tag does not match, then the server SHOULD return the entire entity using a 200 (OK) response. Suggested changes: p6 2.7: If the status code is 206 (partial content), both the stored and new responses MUST have cache validators, and those cache validators MUST match using the strong comparison function (see Section 4 of [Part4]). Otherwise, the responses MUST NOT be combined. p5 5.3: If the cache validator given in the If-Range header matches the current cache validator for the entity, then the server SHOULD provide the specified sub-range of the entity using a 206 (Partial Content) response. If the cache validator does not match, then the server SHOULD return the entire entity using a 200 (OK) response. (only suggesting changing that paragraph, not removing the other one partially quoted above) Regards Henrik
Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 00:24:33 UTC