Issue 181 (Accept-Language: which RFC4647 filtering?")

John Cowan wrote:
> Julian Reschke scripsit:
>> The intention was to normatively refer to that matching algorithm that 
>> actually is equivalent to what RFC2616 used to define (remember, we're 
>> not changing the protocol here). Did we pick the wrong one?
> No, basic filtering is the RFC 2616 algorithm all right.  You might
> consider allowing HTTP servers to do lookup if basic filtering
> produces no results: Apache already does this.
> ...

Now tracked as <>.

BR, Julian

Received on Sunday, 19 July 2009 13:00:24 UTC