- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:39:35 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Mark Nottingham wrote: > FYI > ... Draft 06 adds the "up" relation, for which apparently there is no spec, just a registration entry in the Atom Link Relations Registry (<http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml>). This is similar to "first", "last", and "payment", which aren't new in draft 06. It might be a good idea to clarify that those four link relations are indeed (re-)defined by this specification, as the new registry procedure clearly says "specification required". One way to achieve this would be to have a new chapter that takes over that role, and specified those 4 link relations which currently have no specification (maybe including the details that were present in the original link relation registry). BR, Julian
Received on Sunday, 19 July 2009 12:40:24 UTC